Aug 25, 2009

Criminal Law- People vs. Valledor

This case is with regard to ART 12 par 1

"An insane person is exempt from criminal liability, unless he acted during a lucid interval"


Case of People of the R.P. vs. Valledor
G.R.No. 129291 03July2002

FACTS OF THE CASE:


This case is about Enrico Valledor’s appeal of his conviction for the crime of consummated, frustrated and attempted murder. Last 06 March 1991, the appellant attacked Roger Cabiguen (stabbed on the forearm), Elza Rodriguez (stabbed on the chest), Ricardo Maglalang (was inflicted w/ physical injuries on different parts of the body) There were two other people inside the room (they were not harmed by the appellant). Roger and Ricardo were both wounded, while Elza died from the stab wound. After his arrest, accused-appellant was intermittently confined at the National Center for Mental Health. Thus, he was arraigned only on February 19, 1993 wherein he pleaded not guilty. Thereafter, the cases were archived until November 15, 1994, when accused-appellant was declared mentally fit to withstand trial. This time, accused-appellant admitted commission of the crimes charged but invoked the exempting circumstance of insanity.

The appellant’s plea of insanity was anchored on the following instances:
1.) On January 1990 the Mother of the appellant noticed that he is behaving abnormally. The mother then brought the appellant to Dr. de Guzman, a medical practitioner. She then disclosed to the doctor that insanity runs in the family
2.) Dr. de Guzman then diagnosed the appellant as suffering from “psychosis w/ schizophrenia” and prescribed the appellant w/ an anti-depressant known as thoracin which kept the appellant sane for a period of 2 months
3.) On 04 March 1991, the appellant’s mother noticed that he is acting strangely, so she left to buy Thoracin, but when she returned the appellant is nowhere to be found.
4.) On 06 March 1991 (date of commission of crime) he was seen swimming across the river Barangay Captain and Councilman took the appellant out of the water inside the boat, accused-appellant kept on crying and uttering words to the effect that his family will be killed. Suspecting that appellant was mentally ill, the Barangay Captain, asked the Councilman to accompany accused-appellant to Puerto Princesa City. Sibunga acceded and thereafter took a jeepney with appellant, while on the jeepney the appellant then jumped off the jeepney and boarded a tricycle.
5.) On 11 March 1991 he was interviewed by the City Health Officer I and was recommended to be committed to the NATIONAL MENTAL HOSPITAL
6.) While under the care of the hospital the medical findings for the appellant was that he was suffering from: Psychosis or Insanity classified under Schizophrenia

ISSUES OF THE CASE:

Can Insanity as an exempting circumstance be granted to the accused?

No, since in considering insanity as a defense, it presumed that all persons to be of sound mind. Otherwise stated, the law presumes all acts to be voluntary, and it is improper to presume that acts were done unconsciously
- The acts made by the appellant shows that he does not have complete absence of the power to discern as shown by his stabbing of the two victims (roger and elza) while leaving the other two people in the room unharmed, also his action of fleeing from the scene after the incident indicated that he was aware of the wrong he committed.
- The actions performed by the appellant does not sufficiently prove his insanity at the time of commission of the crime: "A man may act crazy but it does not necessarily and conclusively prove that he is legally so."
- Although it can be argued that the appellant is suffering from mental illness what is decisive is his mental condition at the time of the perpetration of the offense. Failing to discharge the burden of proving that he was legally insane when he stabbed the victims, he should be held liable for his felonious acts.

HELD:


THE COURT FOUND THE ACCUSED GUILTY WITH MODIFICATIONS: HE IS GUILTY OF THE CRIME OF MURDER FOR THE KILLING OF ELZA RODRIGUEZ, AND ATTEMPTED MURDER FOR BOTH ROGER CABIGUEN AND ROGELIO MAGLALANG (FROM FRUSTRATED MURDER FOR INJURIES CAUSED TO MAGLALANG IT WAS REDUCED TO ATTEMPTED MURDER)


I hope this helps.

Jeff David

No comments:

Post a Comment

If you have any comments on the above cases or topics, by all means!